State of Uttaranchal & Ors. _____ Petitioner(s) v. M/s. Kumaon Stone Crusher _____ Respondent. Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No. 19445/2004, decided on …
DetailsR.Sundar Vs The Sub Inspector of Police on 12 Oct 2023 (2,208 views) Shama Sharma Vs Kishan Kumar on 10 Jan 2024 (1,658 views) Mamta Shailesh Chandra Vs State of Uttarakhand and Ors on 29 Jan 2024 (1,601 views) NCV Aishwarya Vs AS Saravana Karthik Sha on 18 Jul 2022 (1,437 views) Kinjal Jayesh Mehta Vs Disha Jimit …
DetailsKumaon Stone Crusher vs. State of Uttarakhand, submits that boulders crushed into grits retain same characteristic that is forest produce. By obtaining grits, stone chips and dust …
DetailsBench: Mamidanna Satya Ratna Sri Ramachandra Rao, Jyotsna Rewal Dua. M/s Lakhwinder Sigh Stone Crushers Vs. UOI & Ors . CWP No.8637 of 2023 . 07.11.2023 Present: Mr. Sahil Singla, Mr. Sachit Singla and Mr. Arvind Sharma, Advocates, for the petitioner. Mr. Balram Sharma, Deputy Solicitor General of India, for respndents , 3 …
DetailsShri Ravindra Srivastava, learned senior counsel leading the arguments on behalf of the State of U.P. contends that this Court in State of U.P. and others vs. Sitapur Packing Wood Suppliers and others, 2002(4)SCC 566, has upheld the validity of 1978 Rules and has pronounced that transit fee is a regulatory in nature and for regulatory fee quid ...
DetailsThe Joint Inspection Committee, which was constituted under the order of the respondent no. 3, has given its report after the spot inspection on 08.09.2013, stating therein that the …
DetailsThe appellants in these matters are direct recruits to the post of Forest Rangers in the State of U.P, now Uttaranchal. The respondents are the State of U.P, State of Uttarnchal and Ors. The brief facts are as follows: In the state of U.P, during the period 1969-1979, there was no direct appointment to the post of Forest Rangers.
DetailsLaw Lalkua Gold Ore Feeder Vs Others >> Law Lalkua Gold Ore Feeder Vs Others Fdic Law Regulations Related Acts Miscellaneous Foreign exchangerate and gold Equity Other 3 includes commodities and precious metals except gold 1 year or less 015 015 20 06 Over 1 to 3 years 03 03 20 18 Over 3 to 5 years 06 06 20 30 Over 5 to 10 years 12 12 20
DetailsSimilarly, the Attorney General for India can be appointed after he/she attains the age of 65 years. In a number of other cases regarding the appointment of other authorities, the Courts have consistently taken a similar view. This Court in Binay Kant Mani Tripathi v. Union of India (1993) 4 SCC 49, (1993) 25 ATC 462 has reaffirmed this ...
DetailsState of Uttaranchal & Ors. by Court Verdict · July 29, 2013. Email. Appeal: Civil Appeal No. 1155 of 2006. [From the Judgement and Order dated 28.05.2004 of the High Court of Uttaranchal at Nainital in Special Appeal No. 16 of 2003] Petitioner: Devendra Kumar. Respondent: State of Uttaranchal & Ors. Apeal: Civil Appeal No. 1155 …
DetailsIn other words the value of expert evidence depends largely on the cogency of reasons on which it is based." [See Forensic Science in Criminal Investigation & Trial (4th Edn.), by B.R Sharma.] 38. The purpose of expert testimony is to provide the trier of fact with useful, relevant information.
DetailsCase Law Lalkua Stone Crusher Vs Others Uttaranchal, case law lalkua stone crusher vs others uttaranchal. State Of Uttaranchal vs MS Kumaon Stone Crusher on 15 Ms Kumaon Stone Crusher filed a writ petition praying for quashing the order dated 14061999 issued by Conservator of Forest and order dated 01061999 issued by Divisional Forest …
Detailscase law lalkua stone crusher vs others uttaranchal . Supreme court rulings indirect tax jan 14, 2019 others saw home rule as a stepping stone to an independent irish republic the republics of the usa and france had gained a special place in the psyche of many irish men and women from this witches cauldron of confusion, conflict and god forbid, consensus, …
DetailsMr. Nayeem Ahmad is resident at Mundia Pistor Village, Bajpur, District Udham Singh Nagar, Uttaranchal. His daughter Yasmeen aged five years having fair complexion and round face, wearing frock, underwear and sleepers was playing near his house at about 5.00 p.m. in the evening of February 5, 1998.
Details6. Facts involved herein remain undisputed. An FIR was registered against the appellant and others under Sections 402/465/471 and 120-B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter referred to as `the IPC') on 10.2.2001. In respect of the same a closure report was submitted on 16.2.2001, which was accepted by the learned Magistrate on 18.8.2001.
DetailsThe facts giving rise to the questions in the present appeal are that the fields of Gurumukh Singh and Dayal Singh were adjoining in the village Salwati within the limits of Police Station Sittarganj, district Udham Singh Nagar. These fields were separated by a mend (boundary mound). On 8th December, 1985, Gurumukh Singh, the complainant, who ...
DetailsKumaon Stone Crusher vs. State of Uttarakhand, submits that boulders crushed into grits retain same characteristic that is forest produce. By obtaining grits, …
DetailsA bunch of 38 appeals were filed by the State of Uttaranchal Forest Development Corporation against the judgment and order dated 21.08.2003 by the High Court of Uttaranchal in Writ Petition No. 1376 of 2001. ... (Van Nigam Karmachari Kalyan Sangh vs. State of U.P and others) was decided by the High Court of judicature at Allahabad vide …
DetailsYou've already forked crusher 0 Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
DetailsState Of Uttaranchal vs M/S. Kumaon Stone Crusher on 15 September, 2017 Warning on Translation Take notes as you read a judgment using our Virtual Legal Assistant and get email alerts whenever a new judgment matches your query ( Query Alert Service ).
Detailsf3. The contract of sale for crude resin between the parties reads as follows : "FORM OF CONTRACT OF CRUDE RESIN Value of the Deed Rs. 3,90,000.00 (Rupees Three Lakh, Ninety Thousand Only) This indenture made this 24th day of March 2001 between the Governor of the Uttaranchal (hereinafter called "Seller" of the one part and …
Details12. In Dr. Chandra Bhan Singh v. State of Rajasthan & Others [AIR 1983 Raj. 149], the question regarding the validity of the appointment of the Advocate General was challenged. The Court in this case had held that the age of superannuation of a High Court Judge did not apply to the post of the Advocate General.
DetailsThe grievance of the petitioners is that the State Government of Uttarakhand cannot force the petitioners to obtain transit pass and to pay transit fee in …
DetailsUttaranchal High Court. Ms Panwar Stone Crusher vs State Of Uttarakhand And Others on 31 October, 2017 ... No. 874 of 2012 M/s Panwar Stone Crusher ....Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand & others ....Respondents Mr. Subhash Upadhyaya, Advocate for the petitioner. ... 8. In AIR 1966 SC 641, in the case of "Harbhajan Singh vs. Karam Singh ...
DetailsIn matters from the State of Uttaranchal, namely, SLP (C) No. 19445 of 2004 (State Of Uttaranchal Petitioner(S) v. Kumaon Stone Crusher (S). Kumaon Stone Crusher (S). ) …
DetailsInder Mohan Goswami and Others, the appellants filed a Criminal Miscellaneous Application No.248 of 2003 in the High Court of Uttaranchal at Nainital under section 482 CrPC for quashing the proceedings against them. The High Court was pleased to pass the interim order on 22.10.2003 staying further proceedings.
DetailsUttaranchal High Court. Kashi Vishwanath Stone Crusher vs State Of Uttarakhand And Others on 4 October, 2017. WPMS No. 2418 of 2017 Hon'ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. Mr. Harshpal Sekhon, Advocate, present for the petitioner. Mr. N.S. Pundir, Deputy Advocate General, present for the State/respondent Nos.1 to 3.
DetailsCase law lalkua stone crusher vs others uttaranchal.lalkuan stone crusher ltd bosenmeerzicht.case law lalkuan stone crusher vs others uttaranchal.j.p.stone crushers pvt.ltd, vs assessee the ld.cit appeals also erred in law and on the facts of the case in ale of objections raised for the other additions.get price.get help.get price.
DetailsThe respondents are the State of U.P, the State of Uttaranchal and others. 5. The brief facts are as follows: In the State of U.P, during the period 1969-79, there was no direct appointment to the post of Forest Rangers. The Government kept promoting Deputy Forest Rangers on ad hoc basis to the post of Forest Rangers if any vacancy arose.
DetailsUttaranchal High Court. Lalkuan Stone Crusher Ltd vs State Of Uttarakhand And 4 Others on 27 July, 2012. ... (M/B) of 2001, M/s Kumaon Stone Crusher Vs. State of U.P. and others, the respondents were restrained from realizing the transit fees twice, on which the petitioner had already paid the transit fee and it was directed that if the ...
DetailsInder Mohan Goswami & Others, the appellants filed a Criminal Miscellaneous Application No.248 of 2003 in the High Court of Uttaranchal at Nainital under section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing the proceedings against them. The High Court was pleased to pass the interim order on 22.10.2003 staying further proceedings.
DetailsGet free access to the complete judgment in Ms Kumaun Stone Crusher Association And Others v. State Of Uttarakhand And Others on CaseMine.
Details12. In Dr. Chandra Bhan Singh v. State of Rajasthan & Others AIR 1983 Raj. 149, the question regarding the validity of the appointment of the Advocate General was challenged. The Court in this case had held that the age of superannuation of a High Court Judge did not apply to the post of the Advocate General.
DetailsCase Law Lalkua Stone Crusher Vs Others. case law lalkuan stone crusher vs others uttaranchal Team submits report on stone crushers in Haldwani, Lalkuan to NGT Feb 21, 2018 Hindustan Times, Dehradun It is not that the stone crushing units are polluting the atmosphere in Haldwani and Lalkuan only, but other districts such as Dehradun, Tehri …
DetailsJan 16 2021 Jan 16 2021 case law lalkua stone crusher vs others uttaranchal. case law lalkua stone crusher vs others uttaranchal. There are only three main judgments rendered by Division Bench of the High Court which have been followed in other cases It is thus necessary to note the facts giving rise to above mentioned three judgments 1 .
DetailsCase Law Lalkua Stone Crusher Vs Others Uttaranchal. Rates of crushed stone at lalkuan uttrakhand stone crusher law seaforth lodge back case law on vatd1 issued to stone crusher next small grinding mill for cement making get price and support online stone crusher and court order and law supreme court order about stone crushing case law …
DetailsThe case of the petitioner is that he runs a stone crusher at Haridwar, in which after a raid made by the Mining Department and the Administration, it was found that unauthorized, …
DetailsState Of Uttaranchal vs M/S. Kumaon Stone Crusher on 15 September, 2017. ... Kulwant Kaur and 79 others vs. Gurdial Singh Mann (Dead) by Lrs. And others, 2001 (4) SCC 262, came to be considered wherein this Court had occasion to consider Section 42 of Punjab Courts Act, 1918. This Court held that Article 254 of the ...
DetailsHost and manage packages Security. Find and fix vulnerabilities
DetailsPE series jaw crusher is usually used as primary crusher in quarry production lines, mineral ore crushing plants and powder making plants.
GET QUOTE