State of Meghalaya Vs. All Dimasa Students Union, Dima-Hasao District Committee & Ors (2019)8 SCC 177 In the said case, a bunch of orders passed by NGT had been challenged in Supreme Court. However, in the said judgement passed by Supreme Court, there is no reference and no discussion in respect of any bar to release of …
DetailsThe stone crushers are in the prohibited distance as per norms which have to be applied even to existing stone crushers to enforce right of habitants to clean environment which is part of right to life. ... Reference was made to the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court dated 30.07.2009 in D.D.A. v. Rajendra Singh, (2009) ...
DetailsIn an appeal by Ministry of Environment, the Supreme Court has called for a report from the Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB) on the issue of pollution by Stone Crushing Units and as to ...
DetailsOn 15 September 2017, the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India (Supreme Court) delivered a judgment in the matter of State of Uttarakhand v Kumaon Stone Crusher deciding the issue of levy of transit ...
Details2020-21/462 passed by 8th Respondent in Revision Petition No.61/2018-19; (b) ISSUE an order, direction, Writ in the nature of Certiorari quashing the order dated 22.11.2012 passed by the 3rd Respondent vide ANNEXURE-. A and the consequent order Dated 30.01.2013 vide ANNEXURE-B bearing No. GabuE:HibuMa:
DetailsApplying Chevron, the district court in each case rejected the companies' challenge to the observer rule and granted summary judgment to the government. 14 Panels of the U.S. …
Details- 2 - After hearing learned Senior Advocates appearing on behalf of the respective appellants and the grievances made, it appears that the main grievances are two fold -. 1. The order passed by the Tribunal directing to pay Rs.20,00,000/- by each stone crusher by way of interim compensation; and . 2. That operation of the stone crushers, …
DetailsThe Supreme Court allowed the appeals and found the transit fee under Rule 5 to be regulatory, stating that it was not necessary for the State to establish quid pro quo. The …
Details4. The assessee company is engaged in the manufacturing of stone grits and dara (mixture of small stones and stone dust from boulders and stone). These boulders and stones were extracted from Gola River from Haldwani after acquiring rights from Forest Department of Uttranchal Government.
DetailsThis Court in CST v. Lal Kunwa Stone Crusher (P...2(e-1) of the U.P Act appears to be similar to the definition under consideration.7. In view of the judgment of this Court in Lal Kunwa Stone Crusher (P) Ltd...have taken, the judgment of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh in Kher Stone Crusher v. G.M, District Industries Centre (1990) 79 STC 149 ...
DetailsThe apex Court in PIL W.P(C)No.651/2005 NEELAMBAR BABA & ORS. Vs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS has not passed any order for stopping the running of the stone crushers and the report of the Central Empowered Committee dated 18.3.2010 is yet to be considered hence, the order dated 19.10.2010 to the effect that Hon'ble Supreme Court has …
DetailsObjection of the appellant is that Doon Valley is a protected area as per Notification dated February 1, 1989 where stone crushing is not permissible in the light of judgment of the Supreme Court (Rural Litigation & Entitlement Kendra v. State of U.P & Ors., AIR 1988 SC 2187).
DetailsWrit Petitions were filed before this Court, challenging the action of the owners/proprietors of the stone-crushers whereby stone-dust and smoke was allowed to pass into the air, …
DetailsAll the writ petitioners supported the judgment of Uttarakhand High Court dated 01.07.2004 in M/s Kumaon Stone Crusher wherein, the High Court has held that no levy of Transit …
DetailsLatest Judgments State of Uttaranchal & Ors. v. M/s. Kumaon Stone Crusher. November 26, 2021. Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No. 19445/2004. Learned counsel for the parties submit that in some of these matters pleadings are not yet complete.
DetailsHaldwani indicated that the stone crushers are located in the vicinity of residential houses and those are causing air and noise pollution in the surrounding areas.
DetailsThe learned Single Judge by referring the judgments of the Honble Apex Court reported in Vam Organic Chemicals Ltd. Vs. State of U.P., 1997 (2) SCC 715, A.P. Paper Mills Ltd. Vs. Govt. of A.P. and another, 2000 (8) SCC 167 and State of U.P. and others vs. Sitapur Packing Wood Suppliers and other 2002 (4) SCC 566, and by …
Details12. Recently the Supreme Court in the case of State of U.P. v. Sudhir Kumar Singh, 2020 SCC Online SC 847 elaborately dealt. with the scope and applicability of audi alteram partem rule. Hon'ble. the Supreme Court after surveying the entire case law, in paragraph. No.39 held thus:-"39. An analysis of the aforesaid judgments thus …
DetailsThe order was set aside by the Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No. 6725/2008 dated 19.11.2008), and confining the definition of "mine" as defined vide explanation (b) to Section 3 of 1949 Act, observed that, the stone crushing activities carried out by those other than mine owners and at a distinct place than the mine are not …
Details1. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 2. Petitioners are aggrieved by District Magistrate, Sonbhadra's order dated 20.05.2017 whereby referring to this Court's interim order dated 12.05.2017 passed in Public Interest Litigation (PIL) No. 18769 of 2017 (All India Kaimoor Peoples Front v.State of U.P), he has directed …
DetailsThe petition was at the instance of Stone Crusher owners who installed Stone crushing units at Jawahar Tekri, Indore alleging that their activity is industrial inasmuch as it …
DetailsIn paragraph 20 of A. K. Kraipak (supra), the Supreme Court held thus:-"20. The aim of the rules of natural justice is to secure justice or to put it negatively to prevent miscarriage of …
DetailsGet Solution & Price Right Now! leave your message here, we'll send you an Email immediately. * *
Details(1) The order passed in writ petition no. 5768/2008 (m/s, anu stone crusher v. Bank of india and others) will also govern the disposal of wrti petition no. 5770/2008 (M/s. Bajaj Stone Crusher v. Bank of India and others) and writ petition no. 5781/2008 (m/s. Saroj stone crusher v. Bank of india and others).
DetailsGet free access to the complete judgment in Sree Srinivasa Stone Crusher v. State Of A.P. on CaseMine. Get free access to the complete judgment in Sree Srinivasa Stone Crusher v. State Of A.P. on CaseMine. Log In. ... Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body …
DetailsGet free access to the complete judgment in Commissioner Of Sales Tax, U.P v. Lal Kunwa Stone Crusher (P) Ltd. . on CaseMine. ... Lal Kunwa Stone Crusher (P) Ltd. . Supreme Court Of India Mar 14, 2000; Subsequent References; CaseIQ (AI Recommendations) Commissioner Of Sales Tax, U.P v. Lal Kunwa Stone Crusher …
DetailsSupreme Court - Daily Orders State Of Uttaranchal vs M/S. Kumaon Stone Crusher on 27 July, 2017 ... We find from the impugned judgment rendered by the High Court that the High Court has not dealt with various issues which were raised by the appellant herein. Instead, it has dismissed the writ petition of the appellant with the …
DetailsClosure of stone crushers leaves labour high and dry. ON MAY 15 this year, the Supreme Court delivered a landmark judgement in response to a public interest suit demanding the closure of the 300-odd stone-crushing units in and around New Delhi. Unlicensed units were immediately closed and the rest are to be shut down by August 15.
Detailsm/s vasavi stone crusher v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA In these writ petitions, petitioners have challenged the orders passed by third respondent whereunder application filed by the respective petitioners for establishment of stone crushing unit has been rejected for the reasons indicated thereunder.
DetailsCeeyen Stone Crusher v. State Of Kerala. Devan Ramachandran, J.:—. The petitioner has approached this Court asserting that they have obtained all necessary consents, permissions and licences for the purpose of operating a stone quarry in their property, having an extent of 0.7871 Hectors, comprised of in Re-Sy. Nos. 496/2A, 496/2B, and …
DetailsPunjab-Haryana High Court M/S Kc Stone Crushing Co vs State Of Haryana And Ors on 4 February, 2021 Author: Gurvinder Singh Gill Bench: Gurvinder Singh Gill ... All Dimasa challenged in Supreme Court. However, in the said judgement Students Union, passed by Supreme Court, there is no reference and no Dima-Hasao District discussion in respect …
Details30.10.2023. The appellant came to know that his counsel has neither appeared on his behalf before the trial Court nor informed the appellant about the proceedings of the case and as such in the absence of the appellant or his counsel, learned trial Court has dismissed the case for non-appearance, not furnishing correct address, not depositing …
DetailsThe Allahabad High Court, in its judgment in Kumar Stone Works (Supra) decided on 27.04.2005 has given a detailed reasoning for not accepting stone grits, stone chips and …
DetailsUnion of India 1992 SCC 256 as also notification dated 18.12.1992 issued by the Government of Haryana came to the conclusion that installing of stone crusher was actionable nuisance and was otherwise in violation of the law laid down by Hon'ble Supreme Court as well as the judgment passed by this Court and accordingly …
DetailsUnion of India (Stone Crushing Case), 1992 Supp (2) SCC 85, cases relating to Stone crushing operation in the vicinity of Delhi, wherein the total closure of the operation ordered by Union of India and crusher owner instead of approaching the Supreme Court in the pending matters, filed writ petitions in High Court and obtained interim orders ...
Details2. The contention of the petitioner is that the said revisional order does not contain any reasons and as such the same is violative of principles of natural justice and requires to be set aside. The petitioner relied upon a judgment of a learned Single Judge of this Court in Sree Srinivasa Stone Crusher v.
DetailsPE series jaw crusher is usually used as primary crusher in quarry production lines, mineral ore crushing plants and powder making plants.
GET QUOTE